Clinton's winning strategy is based on hypocrisy

The Clinton position on delegates is this. To summarize her nomination strategy:

1. The states we've won are the states that matter.
   
2. The states Obama has won are either irrelevant or unfair. Obama does well in the caucuses. These are a) undemocratic and b) unlike the Presidential electoral process, and therefore irrelevant.
   
3. Therefore, although Obama has more votes, more states, more caucus delegates and more primary delegates, he is not fit to be the presidential candidate.
   
4. Therefore, we must convince the superdelegates to ignore Obama's lead and vote in large enough numbers to overturn the apparent will of the party to make her the winning candidate.
   

How are superdelegates more democratic? When did Hillary come to realize that the caucus system was unfair? Was it before or after she started losing them? Did she make any attempt to change this system before she agreed to the rules and started her campaign for nomination?

Just like her U-turn on Florida and Michigan, she is quite happy to reverse her position and change the rules when it suites her. 

In fact she has even attempted to take advantage of the caucus frailties that she simultaneously decries!